Christine O’Donnell, Melanie Sloan, Ethics Violations, Bar Complaint, FEC, Politics, Tea Party, Election 2012
Melanie Sloan, Christine O’Donnell attacker, faces Legal Ethics issues- bar complaint filed by Jonathon Moseley
melanie sloan faces ethics charges?
Melanie Sloan, Christine O’Donnell, Bar Complaint, FEC filing
The Freedomist is following the political hack attack attempted by Melanie Sloan (CREW uses Christine O’Donnell complaint as fundraiser- how lies, slander, and libel gets Melanie Sloan funded- Freedom News) and her progressive cronies (Man throws nephew under bus to attack Christine O’Donnell- The David Keegan Story) who seem to have some unnatural fear of Christine O’Donnell, the Delaware Tea Party Senate Candidate who upset the progressive Mike Castle in the GOP primary (O’Donnell WINS!), only to see the Delaware State GOP turn against her (Teaparty’s Delaware Senate loss pinned on establishment GOP refusal to act- Tea Party News) to assure a progressive victory in the form of Chris Coons (now a proud progressive Senator from the progressive state of Delaware). We stumbled upon this gem from a Virgina Website that outlines a bar complaint against the progressive Melanie Sloan (One down, one to go- FEC tosses out Christine O’Donnell complaint) for her attempt to use the FEC (Breaking Exclusive: Crew Director uses own Father to levy FEC charges against Christine O’Donnell- Tea Party News ) to silence any opponent to her Soros-funded progressive dream for America:
BAR COMPLAINT Against MELANIE SLOAN
re: Frivolous Charges Against
CHRISTINE O’DONNELL
Spreading Lies By David Keegan
from http://www.defenseforvirginia.com/ODonnell.html
Jonathon Moseley responded to false charges brought against 2010 Delaware U.S. Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell from D.C. lawyer Melanie Sloan by filing an official complaint with the District of Columbia “Bar” asking that Melanie Sloan be disciplined or disbarred.
Jon Moseley was required to file this Complaint by Rule 8.3 of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, which requires attorneys to inform the relevant authority of evidence of likely misconduct. As distasteful as such an ‘informant’ rule may seem, and perhaps it should be repealed, it is currently the governing authority regulating the legal profession as it now stands.
The Complaint against Melanie Sloan alleges that (a) Sloan made false statements in the course of representing a client in violation of the D.C. Bar’s Rule 4.1(a), Rule 3.3(a)(1), Rule 3.3(a)(4) (amplified by Rule 3.9), and Rule 8.4(c), and (b) Sloan filed frivolous complaints lacking in merit, that is based upon allegations that Melanie Sloan knew to be false in violation of the D.C. Bar’s Rule 3.1, Rule 3.3(a)(2), and Rule 8.4(c), and (c) Sloan threatened and sought criminal prosecution to improperly gain advantage in an election, possibly a violation of Rule 8.4(g). Moseley became aware of the violations by Sloan while researching the false accusations against Christine O’Donnell, but ultimately had a professional duty under Virginia’s Rule 8.3 to turn over the information to the D.C. Bar.
read more here: http://www.defenseforvirginia.com/ODonnell.html
